It’s been a long time since we’ve had a chance to review a laptop powered by an AMD CPU, but Acer has now launched the Acer Swift 3 powered by Ryzen Mobile, and we’ve got a chance to look at one. AMD has had a tough run in the laptop space over the last couple of years, but with the release of Ryzen in 2017, they are hoping to turn their fortunes around. But a big part of that will be having their partners package Ryzen into laptops that are of high quality, so that’s where Acer comes in.

Acer’s Swift 3 lineup is about middle of their lineup, which includes the Swift 1, 3, 5, and 7 models, and it’s a wide lineup, with Swift 3 models in both 14-inch and 15.6-inch versions, with both AMD processors with Vega graphics, as well as Intel processors, and some of those come with an optional NVIDIA GPU as well. For this review, we’ll be looking at the SF315-41-R6J9, which is a 15.6-inch version with the top-end AMD Ryzen mobile processors in the Ryzen 7 2700U.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700U is a quad-core processor with eight threads, and it has a base frequency of 2.2 GHz with a boost frequency of 3.8 GHz. It supports dual-channel DDR4-2400, and has 384 KB L1, 2 MB L2, and 4 MB L3 cache. But possibly the most exciting feature is the Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics, and in the 2700U it’s the largest GPU available with 10 GPU cores, and a boost frequency of 1300 MHz.

Acer Swift 3 15
  SF315-41-R8PP SF315-41-R6J9
Model Tested
CPU AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
Quad-Core, Eight-Thread
2.0-3.6 GHz 15W TDP
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
Quad-Core, Eight-Thread
2.2-3.8 GHz 15W TDP
Intel Core i5-8250U
Quad-Core, Eight-Thread
1.6-3.4 GHz 15W TDP
GPU Radeon Vega
8 Compute Units
Up to 1100MHz
Radeon Vega
10 Compute Units
Up to 1300MHz
NVIDIA GeForce MX150
RAM 8 GB DDR4 8 GB DDR4 8 GB DDR4 (Standard)
16 GB DDR4 (Optional)
Storage 256 GB SATA SSD 512 GB SATA SSD 256 GB SSD
Display 15.6" 1920x1080 IPS
Networking 802.11ac Qualcomm QCA6174A
2x2:2 MU-MIMO
Bluetooth 4.2
I/O 2 x USB 3.0
1 x USB 2.0
1 x USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-C
SD Card Reader
Battery 48Wh, 45W AC Adapter
Dimensions 370 x 255 x 19.05 mm
14.59 x 10.04 x 0.74 inches
Weight 2.2 Kg
4.85 lbs
2.2 Kg
4.85 lbs
2.1 Kg
4.63 lbs
Pricing (MSRP) $749.99 $949.99 $799.99

Acer’s top model of AMD based Swift 3 comes with enough connectivity in the USB-C port (Gen 1 - 5 Gbps) along with two USB 3.0 ports, and a USB 2.0 port. There’s also an HDMI output with HDCP, and a SD card reader, which is a solid amount of connections on a laptop.

While the 8 GB of RAM might seem a bit low, for this mid-range level of notebook, it’s likely enough. Acer also includes a fingerprint reader with Windows Hello support, and Wi-Fi based on the Qualcomm Atheros QCA6174A, which is a 2x2:2 802.11ac wireless NIC with MU-MIMO support and Bluetooth 4.2.

Before we take a deep dive into the performance, let’s first go over the design that Acer has created for the Swift 3.

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Brett Howse - Sunday, May 6, 2018 - link

    Intel is very aggressive on Turbo and Speed Shift has been a big improvement on their CPUs. Here's an article:

    The U series quads can ramp up to 30W for small workloads to get them done quicker. They've worked hard on this feature and it shows.
  • uberDoward - Thursday, May 3, 2018 - link

    'with one CPU Complex (CCX) of four course' Should be 'four cores'.
  • haplo602 - Friday, May 4, 2018 - link

    Hello Anandtech, which drivers did you use ? I'd suggest trying the latest Adrenaline drivers, you should see a 15-20% GPU performance increase ....
  • jcc5169 - Friday, May 4, 2018 - link

    This is what you get when a bunch of Intel fanboys review AMD products ....
  • Da W - Friday, May 4, 2018 - link

    Funny, these scores made me love my surface pro even more.
    Too bad it sits on the desk taking dust while i'm always on my desktop
  • samal90 - Friday, May 4, 2018 - link

    yeah that's the thing. When you have a desktop, a laptop is just good for traveling. I realized that for that for traveling though, I rather just have a cheap tablet to watch netflix
  • darkich - Friday, May 4, 2018 - link

    LOL those GFX manhattan scores are more than 50% lower than those of top smartphones!!..shows just how far behind pc tech is, relatively(not absolutely, for those who need spelling it out)
  • eddman - Sunday, May 6, 2018 - link

    PC tech is not behind even relatively, it's just that intel and AMD don't bother to put faster GPUs in their CPUs; except for a few intel laptop parts:
  • Brett Howse - Sunday, May 6, 2018 - link

    Nothing to do with that. AMD's OpenGL drivers are clearly behind, and there's little reason for them to focus on OpenGL on the PC side. Plus you can't compare benchmarks across platforms like that, especially on the GPU side where PCs run at full precision and smartphones still run at half precision.
  • Farfolomew - Friday, May 4, 2018 - link

    Wow, what on earth is going on in the web benchmarks? An iPhone 8 scores almost 40k in Google Octane, and this can’t even get 25k. It also performs quite terribly in every other web benchmark tested.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now