AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer

The Destroyer is an extremely long test replicating the access patterns of heavy desktop usage. A detailed breakdown can be found in this review. Like real-world usage and unlike our Iometer tests, the drives do get the occasional break that allows for some background garbage collection and flushing caches, but those idle times are limited to 25ms so that it doesn't take all week to run the test. Those pauses of up to 25ms are sufficient for the drive to complete a reasonable amount of background processing and return to idle, but they don't give the drive much time to cool off.

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Data Rate)

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)

Average data rate on The Destroyer was essentially unchanged by the addition of the heatsink. The difference measured for average service time was slightly higher, but still insignificant. In both cases, the heatsink helped the 256GB drive and hurt the 512GB drive.

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)

The frequency of latency outliers was also subject to some variation between runs, but its hard to attribute it to the influence of the heatsink since the effect was in the opposite direction for the two drives. With or without the heatsink the 950 Pro is posting great scores, and the 512GB drive outperforms the 256GB drive by a wide margin.

Introduction, Design AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy
Comments Locked

69 Comments

View All Comments

  • Refuge - Tuesday, December 22, 2015 - link

    It is supply and demand, not just charge 10% more than BoM on our entire product catalogue. Lol
  • joex4444 - Tuesday, December 22, 2015 - link

    You're also changing the interface from SATA-III to PCIe 3.0 x4. One of these things is mature and common as dirt, one of them is not.
  • Ethos Evoss - Sunday, December 27, 2015 - link

    I already have it on the laptop :)
  • damianrobertjones - Monday, December 21, 2015 - link

    It's the future... until they change it due to wanting people to spend more $$$$ to replace what they already have.
  • TelstarTOS - Wednesday, December 23, 2015 - link

    Not at all. U.2 is the future. M2 drives capacity is crippled.
  • Teizo - Monday, December 21, 2015 - link

    Having LED's on this product will only help sales if it is full RGB so people can adjust the lighting to match their system. Mix/Match lights is a major detraction/distraction for people who go to great lengths to color coordinate their systems.
  • mooninite - Monday, December 21, 2015 - link

    Meanwhile there are starving children in Africa. Geeze...
  • tipoo - Monday, December 21, 2015 - link

    You could say that about practically everything on sites like this, so kindly get off that high horse.
  • Teizo - Monday, December 21, 2015 - link

    Irregardless of your high minded comment, what I stated was in fact true. They decided, more than likely, that LED's would help with sales because gamers and enthusiast love LED's...but a little more thoughtful digging into things would reveal that the ability to color coordinate is pivotal when adding LEDs into system builds. Those kids in Africa are thrilled with your monthly monetary contribution, btw. There should be more people like you in the world.
  • Demiurge - Monday, December 21, 2015 - link

    You know, since the LED's are white... you could, y'know... buy a translucent material of the color of your choice and cover the card LED's with that and get the desired effect... without pestering the company to pander to waste money on that many RGB LED's at which you'd complain about the lack of a competitive price and not buy it anyway followed by you buying one without that is cheaper and buying a an LED strip yourself and attaching it...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now