CPU Performance, Short Form

For our motherboard reviews, we use our short form testing method. These tests usually focus on if a motherboard is using MultiCore Turbo (the feature used to have maximum turbo on at all times, giving a frequency advantage), or if there are slight gains to be had from tweaking the firmware. We put the memory settings at the CPU manufacturers suggested frequency, making it very easy to see which motherboards have MCT enabled by default.

For X570 we are running using Windows 10 64-bit with the 1903 update as per our Ryzen 3000 CPU review.

Rendering - Blender 2.7b: 3D Creation Suite - link

A high profile rendering tool, Blender is open-source allowing for massive amounts of configurability, and is used by a number of high-profile animation studios worldwide. The organization recently released a Blender benchmark package, a couple of weeks after we had narrowed our Blender test for our new suite, however their test can take over an hour. For our results, we run one of the sub-tests in that suite through the command line - a standard ‘bmw27’ scene in CPU only mode, and measure the time to complete the render.

Rendering: Blender 2.79b

Streaming and Archival Video Transcoding - Handbrake 1.1.0

A popular open source tool, Handbrake is the anything-to-anything video conversion software that a number of people use as a reference point. The danger is always on version numbers and optimization, for example the latest versions of the software can take advantage of AVX-512 and OpenCL to accelerate certain types of transcoding and algorithms. The version we use here is a pure CPU play, with common transcoding variations.

We have split Handbrake up into several tests, using a Logitech C920 1080p60 native webcam recording (essentially a streamer recording), and convert them into two types of streaming formats and one for archival. The output settings used are:

  • 720p60 at 6000 kbps constant bit rate, fast setting, high profile
  • 1080p60 at 3500 kbps constant bit rate, faster setting, main profile
  • 1080p60 HEVC at 3500 kbps variable bit rate, fast setting, main profile

Handbrake 1.1.0 - 720p60 x264 6000 kbps FastHandbrake 1.1.0 - 1080p60 x264 3500 kbps FasterHandbrake 1.1.0 - 1080p60 HEVC 3500 kbps Fast

Rendering – POV-Ray 3.7.1: Ray Tracing - link

The Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer, or POV-Ray, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 1-2 minutes on high-end platforms.

Rendering: POV-Ray 3.7.1 Benchmark

Compression – WinRAR 5.60b3: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30-second 720p videos.

Encoding: WinRAR 5.60b3

Synthetic – 7-Zip v1805: link

Out of our compression/decompression tool tests, 7-zip is the most requested and comes with a built-in benchmark. For our test suite, we’ve pulled the latest version of the software and we run the benchmark from the command line, reporting the compression, decompression, and a combined score.

It is noted in this benchmark that the latest multi-die processors have very bi-modal performance between compression and decompression, performing well in one and badly in the other. There are also discussions around how the Windows Scheduler is implementing every thread. As we get more results, it will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Encoding: 7-Zip 1805 Combined

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz, and IPC win in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. For a brief explanation of the platform agnostic coding behind this benchmark, see my forum post here.

System: 3D Particle Movement v2.1

Neuron Simulation - DigiCortex v1.20: link

The newest benchmark in our suite is DigiCortex, a simulation of biologically plausible neural network circuits, and simulates activity of neurons and synapses. DigiCortex relies heavily on a mix of DRAM speed and computational throughput, indicating that systems which apply memory profiles properly should benefit and those that play fast and loose with overclocking settings might get some extra speed up. Results are taken during the steady-state period in a 32k neuron simulation and represented as a function of the ability to simulate in real time (1.000x equals real-time).

System: DigiCortex 1.20 (32k Neuron, 1.8B Synapse)

System Performance Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

110 Comments

View All Comments

  • AntonErtl - Tuesday, August 13, 2019 - link

    Thank you for the review.

    I find the >10% performance differences between the boards on some benchmarks surprising. Do you have any idea what is causing that? Are these benchmarks RAM-bandwidth limited, PCIe-limited, or do the slower boards drive the CPU with more voltage for the same clock rate, resulting in lower clock rate at the power limit? Or something else?
  • mblataric - Tuesday, August 13, 2019 - link

    Since this is workstation oriented, it would be nice to see how it works with Windows Server 2019 perhaps with Ryzen 3900X CPU which os more suited for this board.
    I am looking to build new virtualisation host and I would like to run WS 2019 as on OS, instead of Windows 10 (which just updates way to frequently to be used for my scenario).
  • quantumshadow44 - Tuesday, August 13, 2019 - link

    no default 10GbE = fail
  • zzing123 - Tuesday, August 13, 2019 - link

    +1
  • rrinker - Tuesday, August 13, 2019 - link

    Almost was thinking it's time to go back to Asus. No RGB! Hooray! But only 4 SATA ports? Well, so much for that... I'm looking to rebuild my server, M.2 for the OS drive, SATA for my storage drives, but I need way more than 4 ports. Intel NIC is a plus, wish BOTH of them were, instead of one Realtek.
  • CityZ - Tuesday, August 13, 2019 - link

    If you just need lots of SATA ports, but don't need lots of speed, you can use a SATA port multiplier. With 5x multipliers, you could hook up 20 SATA drives. This is good for archive storage drives.
  • rrinker - Wednesday, August 14, 2019 - link

    Needs to be fast enough to stream a couple of 1080 streams, tops. Unless there is an (unlikely) massive drop in large capacity SSD prices in the next couple of months, the bulk with be spinny disk, with a pair of SSDs for fast cache (the storage software I use supports this), and SSD for the OS drive (I'd use the M.2 slots on this MB). Many f the others I've looked at might have 8 SATA ports, but use one M.2 and you lose TWO SATA ports, use the second M.2 and you lose another SATA - so not much better off. Current server as a 2 port SATA PCI card. 10Gbe would be nice but I don;t have a 10Gbe switch, 2 of the same 1Gbe would be fine for basic teaming.
  • StoltHD - Friday, July 10, 2020 - link

    for approx 100USD you can buy a U.2 to M.2 NVME adapter, one U.2 cable and a NVME m.2 to 5 port SATA 3.0 adapter, giving you 5 ports (multiplier) on the U.2 port (Or you can buy a NVME m.2 to 4-port SATA adapter ...

    And if you can also add a NVME to SATA to the second M.2 slot ... thats 10 sata ports.
    I do not know yet of the motherboard sata chip support sata multiplier but if it does, you can add 4 multipliers to those to and get 20 sata ports on thos 4, if you set up a ZFS system correct, you will get near the speed of 4x sata-6 ... or you can use the second (2x pci-e 4) for cache ...

    The second M.2 runs a little over half speed on a pci-e v3 ssd, so it should be usefull for cache ...
  • WatcherCK - Tuesday, August 13, 2019 - link

    Can someone explain how the ECC support for Ryzon Pro works? Do you need a Pro cpu to be able to fully utilize ECC, from what I understand the Pro cpus are more for OEMs to be used in business grade machines...would a standard Ryzen CPU still work?

    With 3 PCIe slots you could do alot with it, NAS or virtualization and for less than what a threadripper system would cost... Just not available in NZ :(
  • zzing123 - Tuesday, August 13, 2019 - link

    No, all Ryzen (except maybe the really low-end/mobile ones) support ECC. The only thing you need to look for is the motherboard and DIMMs.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now