GPU Performance

This generation GPU performance uplifts of the new Snapdragon 855 were relatively muted in devices that we’ve tested until now; Qualcomm had only promised and managed an average improvement of 20% over last year’s Snapdragon 845, even though the chip came on a new process node that should have enabled it for larger power and performance improvements.

The OnePlus 7 Pro thus seemingly shouldn’t be any different than the S10, G8 or other S855 phones in terms of the peak performance of the phone. Where OnePlus however can differentiate itself is the sustained performance of workloads. The company had made an emphasis on its “10-layer cooling system” which in layman terms consists of a heatpipe system with some new carbon dissipation tape in the internal design of the phone and its motherboard. In particular OnePlus claims no slow-downs in games, while it’s not the first company to promise this, let’s see if this time around the phone is able to achieve this.

3DMark Sling Shot 3.1 Extreme Unlimited - Physics

Starting off with the 3DMark Physics test which is mostly a CPU performance workload within a GPU power constrained scenario, we see that the peak performance of the phone is in line with other SoCs of this generation. What does stand out however is that the sustained performance, even though not as good as what we see on Kirin 980 devices, is indeed better than the Galaxy S10+ and the G8.

3DMark Sling Shot 3.1 Extreme Unlimited - Graphics

Moving onto actual GPU-constrained scenarios, we’re now starting to see what OnePlus was talking about: The OnePlus 7 Pro doesn’t seem to throttle much at all even after long prolonged periods of load. In 3DMark the device takes the very top spot in terms of performance. Until now last year’s Note9 was still the leader in this regard precisely because it was throttling less than newer Snapdragon 855 phones this year, but now with the OP7Pro also not throttling, it’s actually able to consistently showcase the SoC’s actual performance improvement.

GFXBench Aztec Ruins - High - Vulkan/Metal - Off-screen GFXBench Aztec Ruins - Normal - Vulkan/Metal - Off-screen

In the GFXBench Aztec benchmarks we see a similar story: There’s almost no throttling at all happening, and the device is able to maintain near peak performance seemingly endlessly.

GFXBench Manhattan 3.1 Off-screen GFXBench T-Rex 2.7 Off-screen

In Manhattan 3.1 and T-Rex we again see excellent sustained performance. It was a bit odd to see that the OP7Pro’s peak performance was slightly less than the S10+ and G8’s, it’s possible OnePlus is running the GPU at a slightly lower clock or has the DRAM running at more lax timings. However this doesn’t matter as it takes the performance lead after a short period of gaming.

Outstanding Sustained Performance – At A Cost

Overall, the OnePlus 7 Pro is currently the best performing Android device out there for gaming. OnePlus indeed was able to achieve an excellent thermal dissipation system, and the phone is able to disperse the heat across its chassis in a much more even manner than any other phone.

It’s to be noted that this still isn’t enough to catch up to Apple’s latest iPhone – here we’re just hitting fundamental limits of the Snapdragon 855 chipset which isn’t able to compete in performance and efficiency to the latest A12 chipset.

Although the thermal dissipation system of the OnePlus 7 Pro is excellent and better than a lot of other devices in the market right now, it does come at a cost. The company is still extremely lax in terms of maximum device temperatures under load. I was able to measure a peak of 51°C in terms of screen skin temperature, whereas devices such as the S10 will not allow for more than 42-43°C in the same scenario. So while the phone is extremely performant, it’s also extremely hot and the battery drain at these performance levels is also quite extreme and will go from 100% to 0% in less than 3 hours.

In the end, such load scenarios won’t be encountered by most users in every-day games, although if the game has an unlocked framerate, it will mean a lot more load than other 60Hz devices.

System Performance Display Measurement - A Great Screen
Comments Locked

91 Comments

View All Comments

  • zodiacfml - Thursday, June 20, 2019 - link

    Additionally, it is essentially heat that hurts batteries regardless of charging rates. One PLus' implementation of rapid charging might be less harmful or the same as other fast charging techniques
  • cha0z_ - Monday, July 1, 2019 - link

    Correct and at the same time wrong. Yes, heat degrades batteries faster, but it's not the only factor. How fast you put charge in the battery also leads to degradation. Enough materials on the web to explain in details - google it.
  • ZoZo - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    I bought that phone, tested it for about 30 minutes, then sent it back.
    The curved display is just not for me, especially because they made it so much more curved than on Samsung phones.
    1. Things tend to "fall off" the edges and give the impression that the screen is too narrow, it's annoying.
    2. Colors are shifted on the edges, especially if you don't hold the phone exactly parallel to your eyes. White appears grayish green.
    3. Glare is more frequent as light can be reflected not only from the front of the display, but also from its sides.

    What a waste.
  • ZoZo - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    I'll just add that I don't understand how most reviewers overlooked these problems. Is it just me?
  • RSAUser - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    Nope, I hate pretty much all curves besides 2.5D since it makes it easier to grip, but it doesn't mean the image display itself has to be curved.
  • GC2:CS - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    It is good to know that this phone does come with compromises built in, unlike some other sites that make you believe that this phone (like the phone released a week ago) is going to change the whole industry, just because it is cheap.

    Some points
    1. Do you have some power measurements at peak sustained power or it has been done before ?
    -> Am I the only one who thinks that increasing performance on mobile, by implementing heat pipes, coper plates and fans, and run it all as hot as possible is just ridiculous ?!?
    2. This device supposedly comes without display lamination ! Can someone confirm/deny ? OLED's will get destroyed when exposed to humidity.
    3. Regarding high refresh rates, we really need an Apple implementation- custom T-CON, GPU regulating the refresh and continuously variable refresh rate in a wide range (like 24-120 fps) to save energy. To my knowledge this is possible thanks to IGZO backplane iPad pro uses. And no OLED panel is using that yet. Is there a compatibility problem ?
  • martixy - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    I could not care less about the camera and the rest looks like an amazing package(bar lack of 3.5mm), but this is a skip for me because WiFi 6 is on the horizon and I'm going all in when it arrives.
  • Flunk - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    If I was looking for a new phone right now, this would be the obvious one (I love my OnePlus 5T), but it looks like the price has creeped up to near top-end pricing. Not only that, but OnePlus seems to realize that too with the OnePlus 7 and 7 Pro. Unfortunately the 7 is not available in my market, which is very frustrating. I'd have to pay for a battery-sapping screen and 2 additional novelty cameras that I'd never use.

    All in, if I broke my current phone tomorrow I'd have to go on a hunt for my new phone instead of just going back to OnePlus because this phone is just too expensive and it's only too expensive because of those gimmicks.
  • syxbit - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    >>This is not only because it’s OnePlus’ first ever 1440p screen which is a great improvement in sharpness,

    Can you tell the difference between 1080p and 1440p on a 6" device?
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    Yes, very much.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now